More than 120 spoken languages, none of them named
D-ID states that its avatars can narrate or converse in more than 120 languages and accents. No list of those languages appears on the page carrying the claim, so the cell records a count rather than a set. As of 2026-09-22.
| The claim | What it settles | What it does not |
|---|---|---|
| More than 120 languages and accents | That the vendor believes its inventory is large | Whether any one market is in it |
| Languages and accents counted together | That the figure is not a count of languages alone | How the two are split |
| Natural pronunciation, expressive delivery | How the vendor describes the result | Nothing checkable from outside |
| No list on the page | That the count cannot be searched | Whether a list exists elsewhere |
Inclusion rule. One published claim, split into what it settles and what it leaves open. Only wording from the vendor's own page is used. Order. The count first, then its composition, then the description, then the gap.
1Languages and accents in one figure
The claim counts languages and accents together. Those are different units: a single language with several regional voices adds to a figure like this one as fast as several languages do, and the vendor has not said in what proportion.
Another vendor here publishes a 143-row table where one language accounts for fourteen rows through its regional variants. That is what a combined figure can conceal, and it is why a count of this shape cannot be compared with a count of named languages.
2Four vendors publish a count with no list
This is one of four cells in the register holding a number and nothing else. The others are five, more than 135, and a page carrying both 100+ and 140+. The numbers range across two orders of magnitude and are equally uncheckable.
Between them they make the argument for keeping counts and lists visibly different in the table. A reader can search a list for their own market in a second; with a count they have to write to the vendor, and the answer is not repeatable by anyone else.
3Two site languages beside a claim of 120
The same vendor declares two site alternates, German and English. That is the widest internal spread in this register between what a company has translated and what it says its product can speak.
Neither figure bears on the other, and the pairing is a useful reminder that a language switcher is no proxy for output. On this row the shorter figure is the one can be verified and the larger one is the one a buyer actually needs.
4Sources
Quoted from the D-ID AI avatars page, read alongside the markup of d-id.com. The column itself is described on dialogue language, and every cell D-ID fills is on its tool page.
5The same column, tool by tool
| Tool | Voice languages |
|---|---|
| CapCut | No list published |
| D-ID | 120+, count only |
| Fliki | 91 named, plus 117 dialects |
| Hailuo | No list published |
| HeyGen | Two named lists, no total |
| Higgsfield | No list published |
| invideo AI | No list published |
| Kling AI | Five, count only |
| LTX Studio | No list published |
| Pika | No list published |
| PixVerse | No list published |
| Rask AI | 135+, count only |
| Runway | No list published |
| SceneMixer | 15, plus Cantonese for dialogue |
| Synthesia | 143 named |
| VEED | 29 dub-to, 72 detectable |
| Vidnoz | 100+ and 140+, counts only |
| Vidu | No list published |
Inclusion rule. Tools with a public English site selling AI video generation or AI video dubbing. Site languages count hreflang alternates served from the host being read; x-default and alternates pointing at another host are not counted, for every vendor alike. Order. Alphabetical by tool name.
Neighbouring cells: CapCut: dialogue language and Fliki: dialogue language. All of them together: the cell index and the register table.
- Voice languages“Avatars can narrate or converse in more than 120 languages and accents, with natural pronunciation and expressive delivery”count published without a list
- Output languagesNo public list (as of 2026-09-12)no list published