Languages VEED publishes for
VEED (veed.io) declares no language versions of its own site. Its dubbing help page publishes two lists instead of one: 72 languages it states it can detect in the original file and 29 it states it can dub to. Neither list carries a total. As of 2026-09-22.
| Column | Count | Codes |
|---|---|---|
| Site languages | None declared | - |
| Output languages | No list published | - |
| Voice languages | 29 dub-to | 72 detectable in the source |
Inclusion rule. The same three columns are kept for every tool in the register; a column the vendor does not publish is recorded as no list rather than filled from a product description. Order. Fixed column order, identical on every tool page.
1Seventy-two in, twenty-nine out
The dubbing article prints two lists one after the other. The first is headed for supported spoken languages and introduced as the languages that can be detected in the original file; it runs to 72 entries. The second is headed for supported target languages and introduced as the languages the tool can dub to; it runs to 29. Neither heading carries a number, so the counts here come from counting the rows.
Almost no vendor publishes this split, and it is the most useful thing on the page. Detection and generation are different problems: recognising Finnish speech in an upload needs a speech model, and producing Finnish speech needs a voice. A tool can be good at the first and have nothing for the second, and here the vendor has said so in the only way that can be checked, by printing both sets.
2The asymmetry is what a buyer should read first
A single figure for this product would have to be 72 or 29, and either would mislead. Seventy-two would promise output in forty-three languages that cannot be produced. Twenty-nine would hide a genuinely broad ability to work from foreign-language source material, which is what a studio licensing archive footage actually needs. The register records both, in one cell, with the shorter number first because it is the one that reaches an audience.
It also explains why the voice column is worded as it is elsewhere in this register. When a vendor publishes a single number for languages supported, this row is the reason to ask which side of the pipe it describes. Most do not say, and a reader has no way to find out; here the answer is printed twice and labelled.
3A help centre in English, and a site that declares nothing
No hreflang alternates are declared anywhere on the site, which in the site column groups this vendor with the ones that publish nothing at all. As with Fliki and HeyGen, the grouping is a consequence of measuring one thing at a time: on its own pages this vendor sells in English, and that is a fact about the pages rather than about the product.
The middle column is empty as well. Nothing published says what language a generated subtitle file or transcript arrives in when the source is not English, which for a tool built around transcription is a notable omission; the detection list implies the machinery exists. What is recorded is that the question is not addressed, because a reader cannot settle it from the pages.
4Sources
Both lists are counted on the dubbing languages help article, with alternates counted on veed.io, read 2026-09-22.
5Where this entry sits in the register
| Tool | Voice languages |
|---|---|
| CapCut | No list published |
| D-ID | 120+, count only |
| Fliki | 91 named, plus 117 dialects |
| Hailuo | No list published |
| HeyGen | Two named lists, no total |
| Higgsfield | No list published |
| invideo AI | No list published |
| Kling AI | Five, count only |
| LTX Studio | No list published |
| Pika | No list published |
| PixVerse | No list published |
| Rask AI | 135+, count only |
| Runway | No list published |
| SceneMixer | 15, plus Cantonese for dialogue |
| Synthesia | 143 named |
| VEED | 29 dub-to, 72 detectable |
| Vidnoz | 100+ and 140+, counts only |
| Vidu | No list published |
Inclusion rule. Tools with a public English site selling AI video generation or AI video dubbing. Site languages count hreflang alternates served from the host being read; x-default and alternates pointing at another host are not counted, for every vendor alike. Order. Alphabetical by tool name.
Next entry in the register: Vidnoz. Previous entry: Synthesia. Every tool side by side is in the register, and the rule behind each count is on the how counted page.
- Site languagesNo language alternates declarednothing declared
- Voice languagesA list headed “Supported spoken languages:” with 72 entries, introduced as “the languages that we can detect in the original file”input side of the dubbing list
- Voice languagesA second list headed “Supported Target languages” with 29 entries, introduced as “the languages we can dub to”output side of the dubbing list
- Voice languagesNeither list carries a total; the two are printed one after the other on the same pagehow the lists are presented