Which vendors name the languages rather than count them
Five vendors in this register publish a named set of spoken languages. Four publish a figure with no set behind it. Nine publish nothing in that column, and only a set lets a reader check one particular market. As of 2026-09-12.
| Tool | What is published | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Fliki | 91 languages and 117 dialects, in two counted sections | The only vendor printing its own totals |
| HeyGen | Two alphabetical lists, voices and translation targets | Neither list carries a total |
| SceneMixer | 15 named, plus one language for dialogue only | The same set as the interface, plus one |
| Synthesia | 143 named rows in one table | Languages and dialects counted together |
| VEED | 29 languages it can dub into, from 72 detectable | The only two-sided list here |
Inclusion rule. Vendors publishing a named set in the voice column. A vendor publishing a count, however large, is excluded. Order. Alphabetical by tool.
1Five sets, five different shapes
One is a single table. One is two articles split by what the languages are for. One is two sections with their own totals. One is two lists split by direction. One is a set matching the interface list with one addition.
No two of these are directly comparable, and the register does not rank them. What they have in common is the only property that matters to a reader with a market in mind: the language names are on a page that can be searched.
2The sizes range across two orders of magnitude
From fifteen to a hundred and forty-three. The largest belongs to a translation feature, the smallest to a generation setting, and comparing them directly would compare a catalogue service with a production tool.
Which is why the register prints the mechanism beside the figure. Two cells holding a set of very different sizes can be the right answer for different buyers, and sorting the column by length would suggest otherwise.
3What even a named set leaves open
Which variant of each language. How many voices exist per language. Whether the quality holds at the end of a long list. And for a mixed table, how much of the length is one language repeated as regional variants.
Not one of the five answers any of those. So the best available disclosure in this category still stops short of the casting question, which is worth stating rather than letting a long list stand in for an answer.
4The three columns behind this question
| Column | How many of the 18 tools name a list |
|---|---|
| Dialogue language | 5 of 18 tools |
| Document language | 1 of 18 tools |
| Site language | 9 of 18 tools |
Inclusion rule. The three columns this register keeps. A column stays listed even when no vendor names a list, because silence in a column is itself recorded. Order. Alphabetical by column name.
- Voice languagesA table headed “All languages and dialects supported for Synthesia translation feature”, running 143 named rows from Afrikaans to Zulunamed list published
- Voice languagesAn alphabetical list of voice languages, from Afrikaans (South Africa) to Zulu, with no total printed anywhere on the pagenamed list published
- Voice languagesA page headed “Languages and Dialects” with two named sections, “All languages (91)” and “All dialects (117)”named list published with its own totals
- Voice languagesA second list headed “Supported Target languages” with 29 entries, introduced as “the languages we can dub to”output side of the dubbing list
- Voice languagesSpoken dialogue is set per project to any of the 15, with Cantonese a 16th option for dialogue onlyset per project
5Sources
Counts and lists are read from the vendor pages named in the register, checked 2026-09-12. The counting rule is on how counted. Nearby: Codes naming a market, Declared once only.