OpenArt's pricing page, read for what it says about languages
OpenArt's pricing page sells seats and credits: Starter at $14 per seat a month billed monthly, 4,000 credits, commercial rights listed from Plus. Pages of that shape itemise what a plan unlocks. A language is a different kind of statement, and the register reads none on the pages it checked. As of 2026-10-13.
1What this register already holds
Lines this register already carries that speak to a language claim: named lists, counts with no names behind them, and the two places where a language is written into the picture rather than spoken.
- Voice languagesA table headed “All languages and dialects supported for Synthesia translation feature”, running 143 named rows from Afrikaans to Zulunamed list published
- Voice languagesAn alphabetical list of voice languages, from Afrikaans (South Africa) to Zulu, with no total printed anywhere on the pagenamed list published
- Voice languagesA page headed “Languages and Dialects” with two named sections, “All languages (91)” and “All dialects (117)”named list published with its own totals
- Voice languages“AI-powered audio & video dubbing in over 135+ languages for global businesses, available in-app and via API”count published without a list
- Voice languages“Avatars can narrate or converse in more than 120 languages and accents, with natural pronunciation and expressive delivery”count published without a list
- Subtitles“Target your global audience with AI auto-generated translated subtitles in over 27 languages such as English, French, German, Chinese, and Japanese”a count outside the three columns
- Text drawn inside the picture“Multilingual text generation within frames is now supported, with accurate placement and style consistency across English, Chinese, and other languages”outside the three columns
- Voice languagesSpoken dialogue is set per project to any of the 15, with Cantonese a 16th option for dialogue onlyset per project
2What the pricing page itemises
OpenArt's pricing page is built around the studio rather than around output. Starter runs $14 per seat a month billed monthly, or $13 billed annually, with 4,000 credits a seat; consistent characters are counted in the same list, up to about 13 on Starter and about 40 on Plus, and commercial use rights appear from Plus upward. The one line about what a credit does when a month ends is blunt: subscription credits do not carry over to the next month.
Read as an inventory, the page is unusually complete. It says what can be made, how much of it runs at once, and what the licence covers. The question this column brings is narrower: in which languages a script can be taken in, a document produced, or a line spoken. On that question the page is not merely short — it is organised so the question never comes up, because every feature is written as something the tool does rather than as a setting a buyer chooses once and keeps.
3The three columns a language claim has to answer
The register splits language support into three columns because they move independently. A site can be served in fifteen languages while the voice library covers two; a product can produce documents in a language its marketing pages never mention. Counting one column as evidence of another is the error this register was built to catch, and a page that names no languages at all sits outside all three at once.
What a price list can still settle is the shape of the claim. Where a language is listed among the plan features, in the way a voice library or a dubbed-audio allowance would be listed, there is usually a page behind it. Where a language is missing from a page that enumerates everything else, the register records the absence and keeps reading: the model documentation, the help centre and the product pages are where the same vendor often writes the statement down in full.
4What a published language statement looks like
Three shapes recur in this register, and they are not interchangeable. Synthesia publishes a table of 143 named rows; HeyGen prints an alphabetical list with no total printed anywhere on the page; Fliki divides its own list into 91 languages and 117 dialects with the counts in the headings. Those three can be audited — a reader can look for a language and the register can count one — which is what makes them different in kind from a headline number.
The second shape is a count with no list behind it, a figure like 120 or 135 languages and accents, and the third is silence. Both are recorded exactly as they stand. For a production choosing from this page, the useful test is therefore not the size of a number but which of the three shapes the vendor published, because only the first can be checked before the money is spent.
5The bill that follows a language decision
OpenArt's credits do not carry over, and re-running a finished piece in another language is a re-generation wherever the model performs the line as it renders the shot. That turns the language question into a line item: a series whose dialogue language is chosen after the first episodes exist pays for the choice twice. Where the language is set per project before anything renders — the register's own guide to its fifteen dialogue languages describes the line being performed in the chosen language, with no separate dubbing pass afterwards — the decision moves in front of the spend instead of behind it.
Nothing on OpenArt's page contradicts any of that; the page prices seats and credits, and a buyer who arrives from a pricing search will find that arithmetic intact. What they will not find is the line this whole register is built around: which languages the tool can take in, produce and speak. The tables below put that question to the pages that were read and write down the answers room by room.
6What each one's own pages state, read the same way
| Tool | What its pages state about a language | Read on |
|---|---|---|
| OpenArt | No statement on the pages read | 2026-10-13 |
| SceneMixer | “Analysis and the shot list are separate purchases from rendering, and nothing obliges you to render. People do use the pipeline this way — a script in, a structured shot list out, the footage shot conventionally.” | 2026-10-13 |
Inclusion rule. Rows are the tools this page reads plus one pipeline this register carries. A cell carries the tool's own wording for the language question on this page; a page that does not address the question is written that way rather than read as a denial. Order. Alphabetical by tool name.
| Asked of three pages | OpenArt | Synthesia | HeyGen |
|---|---|---|---|
| What a language claim looks like there | No language line on the plan page read | 9 site languages, and a voice table of 143 named rows | No site alternates, two named voice lists |
| Where the claim sits | Nowhere on the pages read | The docs site, under translation features | A help-centre article, apart from the marketing pages |
| What the register records for it | Unstated, with the date it was read | Counted row by row from the table | Both lists held, with the totals neither page prints |
Inclusion rule. Each cell is the statement this register holds for that vendor, read from its own page; a line a vendor states nothing for is written as unstated, which describes the page rather than the product. Order. As the questions are listed above.
7What the material counted
The material collected for this column counts posts and comments by name, and the questions that recur. Below is the count for the model family the same threads name when they argue about what generated a finished piece, and one line quoted as written.
| Name | Posts | Comment mentions | Positive | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seedance | 16663 | 4285 | 1114 | 450 |
Inclusion rule. Names the collection counted and that this page is about. The positive and negative tallies come from the same posts, and one post can land in both. Order. Descending by posts.
This is terrifying!! Seedance 2.0 just generated a 1-minute film with ZERO editing — the entire film industry
r/generativeAI, collected 2026-10-14
Seedance 4K is insanely expensive, this was $6,000 worth of credits but so worth it! Nexus Ep 2
r/aivideo, collected 2026-10-14
8When staying with the other tool answers the question
- You are buying a studio rather than a model — One plan covers image and video work across 100+ models with story tools and a character system holding up to about 40 consistent characters, which is a different purchase from a rate card.
- The credits are for a single push — Subscription credits do not carry over, so a pack bought for one project lands better on that calendar than a rolling production would.
- Commercial rights are the deciding line — Commercial use is listed from Plus upward, one tier above the entry plan and the first line that separates a test from a release.
Written for the search "openart ai pricing". Beside it: Topview and its captions and MagicLight's dialogue languages.