Which vendors name a market and not just a language
Four vendors in this register write at least one code with a region or script attached. One does it for every language but English; the other three do it once each. Every other declared code in the register is bare. As of 2026-09-12.
| Tool | What is published | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| CapCut | 26 of 27 alternates are language-region pairs | English alone is declared bare |
| Runway | One of five, the Brazilian variant | The only mixed-form set here |
| SceneMixer | One of 15, tagged by writing system | A script rather than a country |
| Synthesia | One of nine, the Brazilian variant | The rest of the set is bare |
Inclusion rule. Vendors whose declared same-host set contains at least one code with a subtag. Vendors declaring only bare codes are excluded. Order. Alphabetical by tool.
1Almost all the variant information in the register is in four cells
Across nine declared sets and a hundred and five codes, twenty-nine of them carry a subtag and twenty-six of those belong to one vendor. So the variant question is answered by one company as policy and by three companies once each.
The three single tags are all interesting. Two name Brazil for Portuguese and one names a writing system for Chinese, which are the two languages in this register where the question bites hardest.
2Naming a market rules others out
A tag is not simply more information. Declaring one country says the page follows that country conventions and implies nothing about the others, so a tagged set can be a narrower offer than a bare one of the same length.
That is why the register prints the form beside the count rather than ranking tagged sets above bare ones. Which a reader prefers depends on whether they want to be included or to be certain.
3Where the tags do not go
No vendor here declares European Portuguese, Latin American Spanish, Canadian French or a regional English. Where a market is named, it is the smaller of the two candidates in three of the four cases.
And no voice figure anywhere in the register names a variant of anything. The column where variants decide whether a release is usable contains no variant information at all.
4The three columns behind this question
| Column | How many of the 18 tools name a list |
|---|---|
| Dialogue language | 5 of 18 tools |
| Document language | 1 of 18 tools |
| Site language | 9 of 18 tools |
Inclusion rule. The three columns this register keeps. A column stays listed even when no vendor names a list, because silence in a column is itself recorded. Order. Alphabetical by column name.
- Site languagesEvery alternate but English is a language-region pair; Russian is declared only as ru-BY and Chinese only as zh-TWhow the codes are written
- Site languages5 languages: en, fr, ja, ko, pt-BRdeclared as same-domain alternates
- Site languages15 languages: ar, de, en, es, fr, id, it, ja, ko, nl, pt, ru, tr, uk, zh-Hantdeclared as same-domain alternates
- Site languages9 languages: de, en, es, fr, it, ja, nl, pt-BR, svdeclared as same-domain alternates
5Sources
Counts and lists are read from the vendor pages named in the register, checked 2026-09-12. The counting rule is on how counted. Nearby: Declared once only, Heard against spoken.