Does a translated site come with a published voice list
Nine vendors here declare more than one site language and nine publish something in the voice column. The two groups of nine overlap on only four companies, so a translated site is close to no evidence that a voice list exists. As of 2026-09-12.
| Tool | What is published | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| In both columns | D-ID, Kling AI, SceneMixer, Synthesia | A declared site list and a published voice figure |
| Site list only | CapCut, Higgsfield, PixVerse, Runway, Vidu | Nothing published about voices |
| Voice list only | Fliki, HeyGen, Rask AI, VEED, Vidnoz | Three declare nothing; two serve theirs from subdomains |
| Neither | Hailuo, invideo AI, LTX Studio, Pika | Nothing published in any column |
Inclusion rule. All 18 vendors in the register, grouped by whether they publish in the site column, the voice column, both or neither. Order. Both columns first, then one each, then neither.
1The two groups are almost disjoint
Five vendors declare a site list and say nothing about voices. Five publish voice material with no site list counted. Four do both and four do neither, which is a fairly even split across all four possibilities.
If the two capabilities travelled together, the overlap would be much larger than four. They do not, and the reason is visible in the business models: the vendors with voice lists and no counted site list are selling dubbing.
2It settles whether a single score is possible
Rank this register on site languages and the top of the table is empty in the voice column. Rank it on named voices and the top of the table declares no site language at all. Both rankings are correct answers to different questions.
Any combined score would have to weight the two, and there is no defensible weighting: a buyer purchasing a localised editing interface and a buyer purchasing dubbed episodes want opposite ends of the same table.
3Four vendors publish nothing at all
Four rows here are empty in every column. They are recorded from their own home pages and have no page of their own, because there is nothing to read closely.
That is a finding rather than an omission. Four of eighteen products in this category have published no checkable language claim of any kind, and a register that dropped those rows would make the field look better documented than it is.
4The three columns behind this question
| Column | How many of the 18 tools name a list |
|---|---|
| Dialogue language | 5 of 18 tools |
| Document language | 1 of 18 tools |
| Site language | 9 of 18 tools |
Inclusion rule. The three columns this register keeps. A column stays listed even when no vendor names a list, because silence in a column is itself recorded. Order. Alphabetical by column name.
- Site languagesNo language alternates declarednothing declared
- Site languagesNo language alternates declarednothing declared
- Site languagesNo language alternates declarednothing declared
- Voice languagesNo public list (as of 2026-09-12)no list published
5Sources
Counts and lists are read from the vendor pages named in the register, checked 2026-09-12. The counting rule is on how counted. Nearby: The emptiest column, Widest and narrowest.