AreaAudit

Which languages each generator says it supports, and where

Tonal language: pitch that changes the word, not the mood

In a tonal language the pitch of a syllable is part of the word. A voice that gets the tones wrong is not speaking with an accent; it is saying different words, and no language count says anything about whether a voice handles them. As of 2026-09-22.

Why an expressive delivery and a correct one can conflictA dramatic performance varies pitch to carry emotion. In a tonal language part of the pitch range already carries the word, so a system can read the news convincingly and be unusable for a scene with an argument in it.A non-tonal languageA tonal languageWrong pitchSounds unusualSays a different wordEmotional rangeFree to varyConstrained by the tonesVisible in a listNoNoDetectable in a samplePartlyYes, to a speakerThe check that would settle it needs an account and a person
Fig. 1 A language appearing in an inventory says a voice exists. It says nothing about whether the tones survive an emotional line.
Why a tonal language is a harder test of a voice inventory. Recorded 2026-09-22.
PropertyNon-tonal languageTonal language
Wrong pitchSounds unusualChanges the word
Emotional deliveryFree to vary pitchConstrained by the tones
Detectable from a listNoNo
Detectable from a samplePartlyYes, to a speaker

Inclusion rule. One property of a language, compared for its effect on synthetic speech. Neither column is a claim about any product. Order. Fixed order, the pitch question first.

1Tone and performance pull against each other

A dramatic performance varies pitch to carry emotion. In a tonal language part of the pitch range is already spoken for, so an expressive delivery and a correct one are in tension in a way they are not elsewhere.

That is why a tonal language is the sharpest test of a voice inventory for drama specifically. A system can read the news convincingly in one and be unusable for a scene with an argument in it.

2A list cannot tell you

A language appearing in an inventory says a voice exists. It says nothing about whether the tones survive an emotional line, which is the only question a production in that language has.

Several tonal languages are declared as site languages by vendors in this register. None of those vendors publishes a voice list at all, so there is nothing to check even at the level of existence.

3The check that would settle it is not repeatable

Listening to a sample with a speaker of the language would settle it in a minute, and it needs an account, a render and a person. None of those can be repeated by a reader of a register.

So this is recorded as a limit of the method rather than as a gap in the table. What can be published is whether a language is named; whether it is usable stays outside what evidence of this kind can reach.

A definition, not a measurement: no vendor figure appears here that is not also in the register. Which vendors declare a tonal language on their own site is on those language pages.

Nearby terms: Diacritic, National standard. The whole vocabulary is at terms; nothing on this page is a claim about a named product.