Ninety-one languages counted, and a feature page that says fewer
Fliki publishes a page headed languages and dialects with two counted sections, 91 languages and 117 dialects. Its translator feature page advertises 80+ languages and 100+ dialects, both below the figures on the list. As of 2026-09-22.
| Where it is stated | Languages | Dialects |
|---|---|---|
| The languages and dialects page | 91, printed in the section heading | 117, printed in the section heading |
| The translator feature page | 80+ | 100+ |
| Difference | The list is 11 higher | The list is 17 higher |
Inclusion rule. Both published figures for one vendor, with the arithmetic difference between them stated rather than resolved. Order. The list page first, then the marketing page, then the difference.
1A vendor that undersells its own list
Marketing figures in this category are usually the generous ones. Here they are the conservative ones, by eleven languages and seventeen dialects. The only explanation on the pages themselves is the plus sign, which invites a reader to assume more.
A benign reading is that the feature page is simply older than the list. That is plausible and unprovable, so the register records both figures with their pages and quotes the list where one number is needed, because a list can be re-counted.
2Counting languages and dialects separately
Two sections with two totals is the clearest disclosure shape in this register. It answers the question that a combined figure hides: how much of the number is new languages and how much is regional variants of languages already counted.
One other vendor publishes a table mixing the two, where a single language supplies fourteen rows. Splitting them, as here, is what lets a reader convert a headline into a market list rather than into an impression.
3A long list from a site that declares nothing
The vendor's own pages declare no language alternates, so its site cell is empty while this one is the second most precise in the register. The pattern repeats at two other dubbing vendors here.
It is the strongest argument in this register against a single language score. Ranked on site languages this vendor is last; ranked on named spoken languages it is near the top; and both rankings are correct answers to different questions.
4Sources
Counted from the Fliki languages and dialects page and compared with its translator feature page. The column itself is described on dialogue language, and every cell Fliki fills is on its tool page.
5The same column, tool by tool
| Tool | Voice languages |
|---|---|
| CapCut | No list published |
| D-ID | 120+, count only |
| Fliki | 91 named, plus 117 dialects |
| Hailuo | No list published |
| HeyGen | Two named lists, no total |
| Higgsfield | No list published |
| invideo AI | No list published |
| Kling AI | Five, count only |
| LTX Studio | No list published |
| Pika | No list published |
| PixVerse | No list published |
| Rask AI | 135+, count only |
| Runway | No list published |
| SceneMixer | 15, plus Cantonese for dialogue |
| Synthesia | 143 named |
| VEED | 29 dub-to, 72 detectable |
| Vidnoz | 100+ and 140+, counts only |
| Vidu | No list published |
Inclusion rule. Tools with a public English site selling AI video generation or AI video dubbing. Site languages count hreflang alternates served from the host being read; x-default and alternates pointing at another host are not counted, for every vendor alike. Order. Alphabetical by tool name.
Neighbouring cells: D-ID: dialogue language and HeyGen: dialogue language. All of them together: the cell index and the register table.
- Voice languagesA page headed “Languages and Dialects” with two named sections, “All languages (91)” and “All dialects (117)”named list published with its own totals
- Voice languagesThe translator feature page says “80+ languages” and “100+ dialects”, both below the totals printed on the list pagemarketing count under the list count