AreaAudit

Which languages each generator says it supports, and where

Variant: the national standard a page or a voice follows

A variant is a standardised national form of a language, such as the Brazilian or the European form of Portuguese. It is the level at which audiences accept or reject a release, and almost nothing in this register states one. As of 2026-09-22.

Where the variant question is answered, layer by layerA marketing page sometimes answers it with a region subtag. A subtitle rarely does. A dubbed voice never does in this register, and it is the layer where an audience reacts inside a single line.Best documented layerA marketing pageAnswered occasionally, by a code carrying a country.A subtitleMatters in vocabulary. Never stated by any vendor here.A dubbed voiceDecides acceptance. No voice figure names a variant at all.Where the question actually decides a release
Fig. 1 Where a variant is named in a declared set here, three of the four cases name the smaller of two candidate markets.
Where the variant question bites hardest among the languages read here. Recorded 2026-09-22.
LanguageWhy the variant mattersNamed by any declared code here
PortugueseTwo national norms with very different audiencesYes, three vendors name Brazil
SpanishCastilian against Latin American formsOnce, naming Spain
FrenchEuropean against CanadianOnce, naming France
ChineseTwo writing systems and several normsYes, one region and one script

Inclusion rule. The languages read here where the national variant changes what an audience hears or reads. Languages with one national standard are not listed. Order. Fixed order, largest audience split first.

1It is the level audiences react to

A viewer in Mexico hearing Castilian Spanish, or a viewer in Lisbon hearing Brazilian Portuguese, notices within a line. Distributors have known this for decades and commission separate versions for it.

So a language list that does not state its variants is silent on the property that decides whether a release is usable. That is true of every voice figure in this register.

2On pages it is answered occasionally, in voices never

Three vendors here name Brazil for Portuguese, one names Spain for Spanish, one names France for French. Those are declarations about marketing pages, and they are the only variant statements in the register.

Not one published voice list or count names a variant of any language. The column where variants matter most is the column with no variant information in it at all.

3Nobody declares the larger side of two big splits

No counted declaration here names Latin American Spanish, and none names Canadian French. In both cases the variant that is named is the smaller audience.

One vendor does declare a Mexican Spanish alternate, and the counting rule discards it because it sits on a subdomain. That is recorded on the vendor page, because it is the only trace of either market in the whole column.

A definition, not a measurement: no vendor figure appears here that is not also in the register. The variant split per language is recorded on each language page.

Nearby terms: Accent, Mutual intelligibility. The whole vocabulary is at terms; nothing on this page is a claim about a named product.