Which vendors print two different language counts
Three vendors in this register publish more than one language figure. One prints 160 and 140 on a single page above a table of 143 rows. One advertises figures below its own published totals. One prints 100 and 140 in adjacent sentences. As of 2026-09-12.
| Tool | What is published | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Fliki | A list page counting 91 and 117, a feature page saying 80+ and 100+ | The marketing figures are the lower ones |
| Synthesia | 160+ in a heading, 140+ in a selector, 143 rows in the table | All three on vendor pages, two on the same page |
| Vidnoz | 100+ and 140+ in adjacent sentences | The larger figure is repeated in a heading |
Inclusion rule. Vendors publishing two or more language figures for the same capability. A vendor with one figure, however unverifiable, is not listed. Order. Alphabetical by tool.
1The direction of the disagreement varies
Two of these vendors overstate their documentation and one understates it. The understating case is the rarer and the safer error: a page advertising fewer languages than the list behind it names cannot mislead a buyer into an unavailable market.
The overstating cases are harder to read charitably, because in one of them the two figures sit on the same page twenty apart. Nothing distinguishes what the larger figure covers, and the larger one is the one repeated in the heading.
2Why the list is always the quoted figure
A list can be recounted by any reader on any day and will produce the same answer. A heading cannot be checked against anything. Where the two disagree, only one of them is evidence, and the register records the other one beside it rather than dropping it.
That rule also settles the understating case without special pleading. The list is quoted there too, which happens to favour the vendor, and the marketing figure is recorded because the gap between the two is itself worth knowing.
3What would explain the gaps
Plausible explanations exist for all three. A figure might count accents and another count languages; a page might be older than the list; a tier might differ. None of the pages says, so the register prints both numbers and declines to pick.
Picking would mean publishing a figure no vendor published. That is the failure mode this register is built to avoid, and it is worth accepting a messier cell to avoid it.
4The three columns behind this question
| Column | How many of the 18 tools name a list |
|---|---|
| Dialogue language | 5 of 18 tools |
| Document language | 1 of 18 tools |
| Site language | 9 of 18 tools |
Inclusion rule. The three columns this register keeps. A column stays listed even when no vendor names a list, because silence in a column is itself recorded. Order. Alphabetical by column name.
- Voice languagesThe feature page is headed “Make Videos in 160+ Languages & Accents in 5 Mins” while the selector on that same page reads 140+two counts on the vendor's own pages
- Voice languagesThe translator feature page says “80+ languages” and “100+ dialects”, both below the totals printed on the list pagemarketing count under the list count
- Voice languagesOne page carries both “in 100+ languages” and “speak emotively and naturally in 140+ languages”two counts on one page
5Sources
Counts and lists are read from the vendor pages named in the register, checked 2026-09-12. The counting rule is on how counted. Nearby: Who names them, Codes naming a market.