Which vendors serve their translated pages elsewhere
Two vendors in this register serve almost all their declared language versions from language subdomains. Under the rule applied to everybody, only alternates on the host being read are counted, so both rows read one. As of 2026-09-12.
| Tool | What is published | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Rask AI | 16 declared, 15 on subdomains | Counted at one, the English alternate |
| Vidnoz | 12 declared, 11 on subdomains | Counted at one, the English alternate |
| Kling AI | One further alternate on a separate domain | A Chinese alternate, not counted |
| SceneMixer | One further alternate on a separate domain | A Chinese alternate, not counted |
Inclusion rule. Vendors with at least one declared alternate the counting rule discards. The first two rows lose most of a set; the last two lose one code each. Order. Largest discarded set first, then the single discards alphabetically.
1The rule costs two vendors almost everything
Sixteen becomes one and twelve becomes one. Those subdomains resolve, the pages exist, and the work behind them is real. A reader looking for a localised interface should follow the raw figure rather than the counted one.
Both raw figures are printed on the vendor pages beside the counted number, because a rule with a hidden cost is not a rule anyone can argue with. A reader who prefers to count other hosts has the figures to do it.
2It hides one market twice over
Two further vendors declare a Chinese alternate pointing at a separate domain, and both are discarded. Companies selling into mainland China commonly run a separate domain for it, for reasons that include hosting as well as marketing.
So the rule that keeps this column comparable is also the rule that makes that market invisible. Both discards are recorded, and the register says plainly that the counted figure is about the host read rather than everything a company owns.
3Why the broader rule was not chosen
Counting alternates on any host would let a company that owns many domains outscore one that translated its own pages. That would turn the column from a measurement of localisation into a measurement of domain portfolios.
Both rules are defensible and only one of them can be applied without judgement per vendor. The narrower rule is stated on every page carrying a count produced by it.
4The three columns behind this question
| Column | How many of the 18 tools name a list |
|---|---|
| Dialogue language | 5 of 18 tools |
| Document language | 1 of 18 tools |
| Site language | 9 of 18 tools |
Inclusion rule. The three columns this register keeps. A column stays listed even when no vendor names a list, because silence in a column is itself recorded. Order. Alphabetical by column name.
- Site languages16 alternates declared: ar, br, cs, de, en, es, es-mx, fr, it, ja, ko, pl, pt, th, tr, zhraw count before the rule is applied
- Site languagesFifteen of the sixteen resolve to language subdomains; English alone sits on the host being countedwhere the alternates resolve
- Site languages12 alternates declared: ar, de, en, es, fr, it, ja, ko, nl, pt, tr, zh-Hantraw count before the rule is applied
- Site languagesEleven of the twelve are served from language subdomains; only the English alternate points at the host being countedwhere the alternates resolve
5Sources
Counts and lists are read from the vendor pages named in the register, checked 2026-09-12. The counting rule is on how counted. Nearby: Site against voice, The emptiest column.