No declared alternates, and a dubbing list with two sides
VEED declares no language alternates on its own host. In its support centre it publishes two lists instead: 72 languages it can detect in an uploaded file and 29 it can dub into, which is a distinction no other vendor here makes. As of 2026-09-22.
| What was looked for | What is there | Number of entries |
|---|---|---|
| Same-host language alternates | None declared | Zero |
| Languages detectable in the source file | A named list | 72 |
| Languages the tool can dub into | A second named list | 29 |
| A total on either list | Neither carries one | Not published |
Inclusion rule. One vendor, one column, plus the published lists that explain what the vendor documents instead of its own pages. Order. Site column first, then the input side, then the output side.
1An input list and an output list are different products
Every other spoken-language list in this register is one-sided: these are the languages we support. This vendor prints two, and the shorter one is the one that matters. A tool that can hear 72 languages and speak 29 is a tool with 29 markets.
The gap is not a flaw, it is a specification. Recognising speech and synthesising it are separate models with separate training costs, and a vendor that publishes both sides has told a buyer something the single-figure vendors have not.
2What the empty site cell means here
The column counts declarations on the host being read. None was found, so the cell is empty, and the support article carrying both lists is itself served in English.
That combination shows up three times in this register, always at a vendor selling dubbing rather than a localised editing interface. For that business the language question is entirely about the file coming out, and the marketing site is a single-language shop window.
3Neither list carries a total
The two lists are printed one after another on the same page with no count on either, so the figures here come from counting the entries. That is the right way round: a list can be counted by anyone, and a count cannot be turned back into a list.
It also means this vendor never states a language number at all. Nothing on its pages can be quoted as a headline figure, which is unusual in a register where six vendors publish a count and four of those publish nothing else.
4Sources
Read from the markup of veed.io, with both lists counted from its dubbing languages article. The column itself is described on site language, and every cell VEED fills is on its tool page.
5The same column, tool by tool
| Tool | Site languages |
|---|---|
| CapCut | 27 |
| D-ID | 2 |
| Fliki | None declared |
| Hailuo | None declared |
| HeyGen | None declared |
| Higgsfield | 5 |
| invideo AI | None declared |
| Kling AI | 20 |
| LTX Studio | None declared |
| Pika | None declared |
| PixVerse | 13 |
| Rask AI | One same-host, 15 on subdomains |
| Runway | 5 |
| SceneMixer | 15 |
| Synthesia | 9 |
| VEED | None declared |
| Vidnoz | One same-host, 11 on subdomains |
| Vidu | 9 |
Inclusion rule. Tools with a public English site selling AI video generation or AI video dubbing. Site languages count hreflang alternates served from the host being read; x-default and alternates pointing at another host are not counted, for every vendor alike. Order. Alphabetical by tool name.
Neighbouring cells: Synthesia: site language and Vidnoz: site language. All of them together: the cell index and the register table.
- Site languagesNo language alternates declarednothing declared
- Voice languagesA second list headed “Supported Target languages” with 29 entries, introduced as “the languages we can dub to”output side of the dubbing list